The Bedroom Tax

I’ve lost count of the times I’ve heard a Tory Councillor ask a Council Officer or housing provider to confirm that a constituent in social housing with a spare bedroom really will have to pay more to stay in their home, or else move out. 

When the officer confirms that this is indeed Government policy, the Councillors shake their heads, roll their eyes and generally give every impression of being in opposition…

A number of Tory MPs have written to local Councils in their constituencies ruing the impact of the Bedroom Tax on local residents. 

That’s despite all of them having voted for the Bedroom Tax when it went through parliament last year, and voted against amendments which would have exempted people from the penalty until suitable alternative accommodation is available. 

In fact only two Conservative MPs voted in favour of these amendments. Our own MP, Mr Chris Heaton Harris, was not one of them. 

It’s a tad late to wake up to the impact of this perverse policy. In just over a week’s time, 13,000 millionaires are getting a tax cut worth £100,000 a year on average. And 660,000 impoverished households, including many families with young children, already hit hard by the cuts, have to find an extra £728 a year on average.

In Daventry District between 600 and 700 households will be directly affected.

The majority of those affected nationally have only one spare bedroom. Only 10 per cent of social tenants under-occupy, compared with 16 per cent of private tenants and 49 per cent of owner-occupiers.  This includes, of course, Welfare Minister, Lord Freud, with his eight bedroom mansion.

The Bedroom Tax is both immoral and unworkable.

It’s immoral because we’re not going to solve the housing crisis by shunting people around like pawns in a political chess game. 

And it’s unworkable because there isn’t the housing stock to support the policy. Over 300,000 people are on social housing waiting lists in the East Midlands region – that’s one in every 15 households. There are over 2,500 people on the housing waiting list in Daventry District itself.

The Bedroom Tax is also a massive transfer of financial risk to social landlords and a (very) thinly veiled attack on social housing.

Last week’s budget presented an opportunity to kickstart a major programme of capital investment in new affordable homes. An opportunity totally missed.

I’ve proposed that Daventry District Council holds an affordable housing summit to consider urgently how we can increase affordable housing provision locally.  

Protests against the Bedroom Tax have taken place in 60 towns and cities and another 50 are planned for this Saturday (30 March), including one in Northampton, starting 1pm at The Guildhall. 

You can sign-up to a campaign to stop the Bedroom Tax here.

I’ll be at the march and I’ve signed the petition. I hope you might too.

Happy Mothers' Day?

I’m the mother of a seven year old and a five year old. Like many other women, I’m looking forward to Mothers’ Day tomorrow. I’m hoping for breakfast in bed, and homemade cards and cake, and hugs a-plenty.

But this Mothers' Day sees family life across Britain more precious and more vulnerable than ever. Women have been hit hardest by the Tory-led coalition’s financial policies. Three times as hard as men, in fact. 

And in a few weeks’ time, David Cameron is giving millionaires a tax cut worth an average £100,000.  As some 85% of higher rate taxpayers are men, many more of them will gain from the policy than women. At the same time, Cameron is asking mothers to pay more. Cuts to maternity pay in real terms amount to a £180 tax which is coming out of mothers’ pockets, just as family budgets are being stretched more than ever.

David Cameron promised to lead the most family friendly government ever. It’s difficult to feel the love, I must say. Here’s a reminder of just how family-friendly he has been: 

x   Cutting child benefit for 1.2 million families

x   Scrapping the £190 Health in Pregnancy Grant

x   Scrapping the Child Trust Fund

x   Freezing child benefit payments for three years

x   Cutting maternity pay in real terms

x   Closing 401 Sure Start Children’s Centres.

Women are the biggest users of public services, all being eroded; they are more likely to be affected by public sector job losses (we make up around two-thirds of the public sector workforce) and more likely to be hit by the unprecedented cuts in welfare benefits: around three-quarters of the money being cut is coming from women’s pockets. 

A recent survey found that, as a result of reduced incomes, one in five mums are missing meals so their children can eat. Women’s unemployment now stands at 1.07 million – the highest level in 25 years.

Let’s look back and remember what Labour did in government:

✓ Increased maternity leave from 18 weeks to nine months

✓ Doubled maternity pay

✓ Opened 3,500 Sure Start Children’s Centres

✓ Introduced Child Tax Credits.

We all know times are tough. But it’s precisely at times like this that families need a government that is on their side, not one that asks mothers to pay more and millionaires to pay less.